The Clothes on our Backs
Visual artist Rachel Breen illuminates inequities and waste in the world’s garment industry and spotlights the oppression its workers endure.
Two days before she started pursuing her fine
arts degree at the U of M, Rachel Breen (M.F.A.
‘06) bought a sewing machine at a garage sale for three
dollars. She’d always been crafty and figured it would
be fun to have a machine in her new U of M studio,
where she looked forward to spending time drawing,
painting, and printmaking. As it turns out, that impulse
purchase would revolutionize her art and help her see
it as a vehicle for social change.
Breen was in her 40s and had already enjoyed a
career as a community organizer, grant writer, and as the cofounder of Jewish Community Action, a nonprofit that
advocates for social and economic justice. She’d always
made art—she still has the first sketchbook her parents
gave her when she was 9—and had taken community
education classes for personal fulfillment in the cities
where she lived, including at Parsons School of Design
in New York and the Minneapolis College of Art and
Design (MCAD). But she says her political work always
felt more urgent. “I always joked that I would be an artist
after the revolution,” she says.
That idea changed in 1998, when her family moved to
China for three years for her ex-husband’s job. While
there, Breen studied the folk art of papercutting, traveling to remote regions to meet women who made the
art—and who had no formal training. “It helped me get
beyond the idea that a ‘good’ artist was someone who
was skilled at representational work,” she says. “I also
realized that art could be a force in social change, [and
saw] that the social changes I worked for as a community
organizer are the work of a lifetime, not just a decade.
Therefore it made sense to find a way to do what I really
wanted and make it a source for change, too.”
As her commitment to making art grew, Breen considered getting certified to teach art in public schools,
only to learn that the curriculum for that degree involved more pedagogy classes than art classes. Instead, she
applied to the University’s M.F.A. program, which
allowed her to focus on her artistic practice. She also
assumed she wouldn’t get in.
“I remember the day I got my acceptance letter,”
she says. “I sobbed. Going to school in your 40s is the
best. I recognized the privilege of being a student and
felt the joy of learning deeply.”
One day during her first semester, she was in her
U of M studio. On a whim, she started experimenting
with sewing paper to fabric.
“I was just playing,” Breen says, over a Zoom conversation from Jaipur, India, where she is a Fulbright
Scholar on sabbatical from her job as a professor of art
at Anoka Ramsey Community College. Behind her, the
sun lights up the whitewashed wall of her apartment’s
balcony. She recalls the day she was sewing and ran
out of thread and how she noticed the holes that the
needle made in the paper.
Those holes opened up rich inquiries for Breen. She
started to think about the sewing machine’s connection
to labor issues. “A lot of people connect sewing to the
domestic sphere, but for me, the sewing machine has
always been a symbol of sweatshops and the labor of
garment workers,” she says. “It has always been deeply
intertwined with my people’s history as immigrants to
the U.S. This is the work that so many Jews entered
when they came to the U.S. at the turn of the century.”
She also realized that stitch marks are something
nearly everyone in the world understands in a very
intimate way. “This mark of the sewing machine is
something that all of us have next to our bodies
[because] the majority of people on the planet wear
clothes that have been sewn in some way, whether by
hand or by machine,” she says. “So, this mark is next
to our skin, and so it connects us all. It’s this thing that
binds us in a metaphoric way.”
A stitch is also a mark of repair, a concept that Breen
connects to the Jewish concept of Tikkun olam, which
translates to “mend the world.”
In 2009, Breen began her current job as an art
professor at Anoka Ramsey Community College.
And she continued making art—a practice that took
another turn in 2013, when a building known as the
Rana Plaza collapsed in Dhaka, Bangladesh, killing
at least 1,132 garment workers. (Bangladesh is known
as a home for low-cost clothing manufacture and
often poor working conditions. According to the
United Nations Development Programme’s Human Development Report 2020, a 30-year-old index
that attempts to measure quality of life, including
life expectancy, conditions are improving slightly in
Bangladesh, but it still ranks 133 out of 189 countries
and territories.)
It was a galvanizing moment for Breen. “I was making
my work sitting at a sewing machine and felt viscerally
connected to this tragedy,” she remembers. The event
also reminded her of the Triangle Shirtwaist Factory
Fire of 1911, where 146 garment workers—mostly Jewish
and Italian immigrant women—died in the deadliest
industrial disaster in the history of New York City. (Later
investigations turned up numerous safety violations,
including locked doors that prevented those inside
from escaping the blaze. Outrage over the working
conditions and loss of life eventually led to improved
safety standards for factories, and to the formation
of the International Ladies’ Garment Workers’ Union,
which represents workers in garment production.)
Breen received a grant from Rimon, the Minnesota Jewish Arts Council, to travel with local poet Alison Morse to Bangladesh, where they interviewed survivors of Rana Plaza and met with union organizers. She also collected fabric scraps that had been tossed out of local garment factories, which became the inspiration for her 2018 work Shroud. The installation was part of a show at Carleton College called “The Price of Our Clothes,” and also a meditation on garment factory disasters. (Shroud was also part of a show called “The Labor We Wear” at the Minneapolis Institute of Arts in 2020.)
The installation is made from 1,281 white
shirts—the color of shrouds in Bangladesh and also in
the Jewish faith—which are hung upside down from the
ceiling so that the arms reach down toward the public.
Taken together, the shirts are ethereal, almost cloud-like. But they are also startling and haunting, each one
representing a worker who was killed at Rana Plaza and
the Triangle Shirtwaist Factory.
Breen says that creating Shroud deepened her exploration into garment labor issues in ways she couldn’t
have imagined when she started. For instance, on a
trip to Goodwill to purchase shirts, she discovered that
buying even heavily discounted, secondhand clothing
can be prohibitively expensive. That discovery led her
to the Goodwill outlet in St. Paul. Standing in a room
the size of a high school gymnasium amidst troughs of
clothes, Breen learned that the overwhelming majority
of clothes that are donated to Goodwill and the Salvation
Army either are shipped overseas to be sold or end up
in landfills. “I realized that while people think they are
doing such a good deed when they donate ... we are just
contributing to the problem in this whole supply chain
of textile waste,” she says.
Breen is a deep thinker and gifted speaker, who is
able to describe her artistic process and the motivations
that drive it in a way that artists and non-artists alike can
relate to.
“I really appreciate the way Rachel investigates actual
societal problems and makes those issues visible to the
rest of us,” says U of M Department of Art Chair Christine
Baeumler, who specializes in interdisciplinary art and
social practice. “We don’t necessarily think about where
our clothing comes from, or the cost to the individuals
who make it, or how they’re compensated or not for their
labor. But one thing that really strikes me ... is that she’s
looking at how systems can be improved.”
To that end, Breen hopes that her work will spark viewers to contemplate solutions to the problem of garment
industry waste. She also wants people to move beyond
where they should and shouldn’t shop—although she
endorses the idea of buying fewer clothes and doing
research to know if they were made ethically.
“What we really need to do is organize collectively to change policy and pressure the garment industry to treat workers better,” she says.